| Posted: 30 November 2009 at 7:38pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
There's nothing wrong with expecting a certain standard of ‘behaviour’ out of, as well as in, the ring - however I have a dog who has Gold Obedience award, and still would probably not have met the requirements being suggested when we first started competing (i.e. Staying in the ring...!!) But for her, the very reason we started agility was to help her with socialisation and overcome some of her fears, and it was only by exposing her to more shows that the situation has improved for her.
No matter how well trained a dog is, there will always be environmental factors out of the handler’s control (like the buffet being served in the marquee next to the ring...OK – so that was only my dog, but you get the point.)
Any dog can be wound up, feel threatened or excited (just want to play) when in close proximity to another dog. The important thing is that the handler does something about it at the time. Handler’s know their dogs well, and often send someone else to stand in the queue if they know this is not a good thing for their dog. I think those who don’t do anything are the ones who should be required to act, not penalise everyone else.
Overall though, my biggest concerns are that Agility will become a sport for dogs bred purely for the sport and for experienced handlers. Rescue dogs who have a few issues, and handlers new to the sport (both true in my case)won’t get a look in, because we can’t develop the skills needed to pass the tests (i.e. in ‘close to show’ conditions) without having been in the situation first....
Rant over!
Alison
|